Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Journal of Digital Social Research

Special Issue on Methods in Visual Politics and Protest

Vol. 6 No. 1 (2024): Special issue: Methods in Visual Politics and Protest: Mixed Methods, Data Curation & Anti-Publics

The contingent macro: The ephemerality of memes as discursive devices

DOI
https://doi.org/10.33621/jdsr.v6i1.202
Submitted
April 29, 2023
Published
2024-03-06

Abstract

This paper investigates how internet memes are complex and stratified objects, going beyond the standardized definition of ‘image macro’ habitually employed by scholars. To this end, we take the 2019 Italian government crisis as a case study and analyze a dataset of related 1.269 memes using a combination of computational and qualitative methodologies. Our analysis shows the emergence, proliferation, and fading of popular templates, which remix images and text from the political crisis and occasionally serve as frames for other events: the Contingent Macro. Together with less standardized memetic instances, we found that Contingent Macros concur to create metaphoric narratives, which develop as the event unfolds. Besides formalizing the concept of Contingent Macro, this work provides scholars with a methodological toolkit for the analysis of event-related meme production, which can capture the fluidity of memes. Overall, the article concurs to underline the need for a clear, context-specific definition of memes, tailored to specific social, cultural, and research contexts.

References

  1. Airoldi, M. (2018). Ethnography and the digital fields of social media. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 21(6), 661–673. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2018.1465622
  2. Al Nashmi, E. (2018). From selfies to media events: How Instagram users interrupted their routines after the Charlie Hebdo shootings. Digital Journalism, 6(1), 98-117. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2017.1306787
  3. Blank, T. J. (2018). Folklore and the Internet: The challenge of an ephemeral landscape. Humanities, 7(2), 50. https://doi.org/10.3390/h7020050
  4. Blackmore, S. (1999) The Meme Machine. Oxford University Press, New York.
  5. Brideau, K., & Berret, C. (2014). A brief introduction to impact: ‘The meme font’. Journal of Visual Culture, 13(3), 307-313. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470412914544515
  6. Bruns, A. (2019). After the ‘APIcalypse’: Social media platforms and their fight against critical scholarly research. Information, Communication & Society, 22(11), 1544-1566. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2019.1637447
  7. Bucur, A. M., Cosma, A., & Iordache, I. B. (2022). BLUE at Memotion 2.0 2022: You have my Image, my Text and my Transformer. arXiv preprint arXiv:2202.07543. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2202.07543
  8. Burroughs, B. E. (2016). Political Memes: Bernie Sanders Dank Meme Stash. In Media Res (A Media Commons Project).
  9. Caliandro, A. (2018). Digital Methods for Ethnography: Analytical Concepts for Ethnographers Exploring Social Media Environments. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 47(5), 551–578. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891241617702960
  10. Chagas, V., Freire, F., Rios, D., & Magalhães, D. (2019). Political memes and the politics of memes: A methodological proposal for content analysis of online political memes. First Monday, 24(2). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v24i2.7264
  11. Dancygier, B., & Vandelanotte, L. (2017). Internet memes as multimodal constructions. Cognitive Linguistics, 28(3), 565-598. https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2017-0074
  12. de Saint Laurent, C., Gl?veanu, V. P., & Literat, I. (2021). Internet memes as partial stories: Identifying political narratives in coronavirus memes. Social Media+ Society, 7(1), 2056305121988932. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305121988932
  13. de Seta, G. (2016). Neither meme nor viral: the circulationist semiotics of vernacular content. Lexia: rivista di semiotica, 25-26.
  14. Dynel, M. (2016). “I has seen Image Macros!” Advice Animals memes as visual-verbal jokes. International Journal of Communication, 10, 29.
  15. Duhaime, D. (2021).?PixPlot. Yale Digital Humanities Lab. https://github.com/YaleDHLab/pix-plot
  16. Gal, N., Shifman, L., & Kampf, Z. (2016). “It gets better”: Internet memes and the construction of collective identity. New media & society, 18(8), 1698-1714. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444814568784
  17. Grundlingh, L. (2018). Memes as speech acts. Social Semiotics, 28(2), 147-168. https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2017.1303020
  18. Heiskanen, B. (2017). Meme-ing electoral participation. European journal of American studies, 12(12-2). https://doi.org/10.4000/ejas.12158
  19. Jenkins, H., Ford, S., & Green, J. (2013). Spreadable media. New York University Press.
  20. Lankshear, C., & Knobel, M. (2019). Memes, macros, meaning, and menace: Some trends in internet memes. The Journal of Communication and Media Studies, 4(4), 43. https://doi.org/10.18848/2470-9247/CGP/v04i04/43-57
  21. Laineste, L., & Voolaid, P. (2016). Laughing across borders: Intertextuality of internet memes. The European Journal of Humour Research, 4(4), 26-49. http://dx.doi.org/10.7592/EJHR2016.4.4.laineste
  22. Lou, A. (2017). Multimodal simile: The “when” meme in social media discourse. English Text Construction, 10(1), 106-131. https://doi.org/10.1075/etc.10.1.06lou
  23. MacDonald, S. (2021). What do you (really) meme? Pandemic memes as social political repositories. Leisure Sciences, 43(1-2), 143-151. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490400.2020.1773995
  24. Marres, N. (2017). Digital sociology: The reinvention of social research. John Wiley & Sons.
  25. Mazzoleni, G., & Bracciale, R. (2019). La politica pop online. I meme e le nuove sfide della comunicazione politica. Il Mulino.
  26. Miliani, M., Giorgi, G., Rama, I., Anselmi, G., & Lebani, G. E. (2020, January). Dankmemes@ evalita 2020: The memeing of life: Memes, multimodality and politics. In EVALITA 2020.
  27. Milner, R. M. (2013). FCJ-156 Hacking the Social: Internet Memes, Identity Antagonism, and the Logic of Lulz. The Fibreculture Journal, (22 2013: Trolls and The Negative Space of the Internet).
  28. Milner, R. M. (2016). The world made meme: Public conversations and participatory media. MIT Press.
  29. Moreno-Almeida, C. (2021). Memes as snapshots of participation: The role of digital amateur activists in authoritarian regimes. New Media & Society, 23(6), 1545-1566. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820912722
  30. Nissenbaum, A., & Shifman, L. (2017). Internet memes as contested cultural capital: The case of 4chan’s/b/board. New media & society, 19(4), 483-501. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444815609313
  31. Phillips, W. (2015). This is why we can't have nice things: Mapping the relationship between online trolling and mainstream culture. MIT Press.
  32. Rintel, R. (2013), ‘Crisis memes: The importance of templatability to Internet culture and freedom of expression’, Australasian Journal of Popular Culture 2: 2, pp. 253–271. https://doi.org/10.1386/ajpc.2.2.253_1
  33. Ross, A. S., & Rivers, D. J. (2019). Internet memes, media frames, and the conflicting logics of climate change discourse. Environmental communication, 13(7), 975-994. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2018.1560347
  34. Rogers, R., & Giorgi, G. (2023). What is a meme, technically speaking?. Information, Communication & Society, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2023.2174790
  35. Rose, G. (2016). Visual methodologies: An introduction to researching with visual materials. sage.
  36. Shifman, L. (2013). Memes in a digital world: Reconciling with a conceptual troublemaker. Journal of computer-mediated communication, 18(3), 362-377. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12013
  37. Shifman, L. (2014). Memes in digital culture. MIT press.
  38. Smith, N., & Copland, S. (2021). Memetic moments: The speed of Twitter memes. Journal of Digital Social Research, 4(1), 23-48. https://doi.org/10.33621/jdsr.v4i1.95
  39. Theisen, W., Brogan, J., Thomas, P. B., Moreira, D., Phoa, P., Weninger, T., & Scheirer, W. (2021). Automatic Discovery of Political Meme Genres with Diverse Appearances. Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, 15(1), 714-726. https://doi.org/10.1609/icwsm.v15i1.18097
  40. Tuters, M., & Hagen, S. (2020). (((They))) rule: Memetic antagonism and nebulous othering on 4chan. New media & society, 22(12), 2218-2237. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444819888746
  41. Vásquez, C., & Aslan, E. (2021). “Cats be outside, how about meow”: Multimodal humor and creativity in an internet meme. Journal of Pragmatics, 171, 101-117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2020.10.006
  42. Venturini, T., & Rogers, R. (2019). “API-based research” or how can digital sociology and journalism studies learn from the Facebook and Cambridge Analytica data breach. Digital Journalism, 7(4), 532-540. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2019.1591927
  43. Vickery, J. R. (2014). The curious case of Confession Bear: The reappropriation of online macro-image memes. Information, Communication & Society, 17(3), 301-325. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2013.871056
  44. Vizcaíno-Verdú, A., & Abidin, C. (2022). Music challenge memes on TikTok: Understanding in-group storytelling videos. International Journal of Communication, 16, 26.
  45. Wiggins, B. E., & Bowers, G. B. (2015). Memes as genre: A structurational analysis of the memescape. New media & society, 17(11), 1886-1906. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444814535194
  46. Yus, F. (2018). Identity-related issues in meme communication. Internet Pragmatics, 1(1), 113-133. https://doi.org/10.1075/ip.00006.yus
  47. Zeng, J., & Abidin, C. (2021). ‘# OkBoomer, time to meet the Zoomers’: Studying the memefication of intergenerational politics on TikTok. Information, Communication & Society, 24(16), 2459-2481. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2021.1961007
  48. Zulli, D., & Zulli, D. J. (2022). Extending the Internet meme: Conceptualizing technological mimesis and imitation publics on the TikTok platform. New Media & Society, 24(8), 1872-1890. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820983603