Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Journal of Digital Social Research

Research Articles

Vol. 5 No. 3 (2023): Trust, Media, and Science in the Context of the COVID-19 Pandemic

Alternative Credibility, Phenomenological Empathy, and the Plandemic: Trust in Consipiracy Theories During the COVID-19 Pandemic

DOI
https://doi.org/10.33621/jdsr.v5i3.146
Submitted
June 2, 2022
Published
2023-09-01

Abstract

Plandemic: The Hidden Agenda behind COVID-19 is a twenty-six-minute film that went viral during the spring of 2020. The film invited controversy for sowing doubt in the official account of the COVID-19 pandemic by presenting an alternate perspective on several key issues such as masking, vaccines, and COVID-19 control measures. The film also vilified public health institutions and officials like Antony Fauci, among others. This paper aims to evaluate how conspiracy theories like the Plandemic find fertile ground during moments of crisis like the COVID-19 pandemic. To accomplish this the paper has two aims: (i) highlight the crucial role played by ‘alternative credibility’ and ‘empathy’ in garnering trust; (ii) identify how both concepts operate in the opening segment of the Plandemic, when the film’s protagonist Judy Mikovits is introduced in a manner that commentators claim played a crucial role in gaining the audience’s trust.

References

  1. Altig, D., Baker, S., Barrero, J. M., Bloom, N., Bunn, P., Chen, S., Davis, S. J., Leather, J., Meyer, B., Mihaylov, E., Mizen, P., Parker, N., Renault, T., Smietanka, P., & Thwaites, G. (2020). Economic uncertainty before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Public Economics, 191, 104274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2020.104274
  2. Aupers, S. (2012). ‘Trust no one’: Modernization, paranoia and conspiracy culture. European Journal of Communication, 27(1), 22–34. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323111433566
  3. Bailey, O. (2018). Empathy and Testimonial Trust. Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement, 84, 139–160. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1358246118000589
  4. Cook, J., Linden, S. van der, Lewandowsky, S., & Ecker, U. (2020, May 15). Coronavirus, “Plandemic” and the seven traits of conspiratorial thinking. The Conversation. http://theconversation.com/coronavirus-plandemic-and-the-seven-traits-of-conspiratorial-thinking-138483
  5. De Vecchi, F. (2019). Eidetics of Empathy: Intersubjectivity, Embodiment and Qualitative Ontology. Humana.Mente Journal of Philosophical Studies, 36, 221–243.
  6. DiResta, R., & Garcia-Camargo, I. (2020, May 26). Virality Project (US): Marketing meets Misinformation. https://cyber.fsi.stanford.edu/io/news/manufacturing-influence-0
  7. Douglas, K. M. (2021). COVID-19 conspiracy theories. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 24(2), 270–275. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430220982068
  8. Douglas, K. M., & Sutton, R. M. (2015). Climate change: Why the conspiracy theories are dangerous. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 71(2), 98–106. https://doi.org/10.1177/0096340215571908
  9. Enserink, M., & Cohen, J. (2020, May 8). Fact-checking Judy Mikovits, the controversial virologist attacking Anthony Fauci in a viral conspiracy video. Science. https://www.science.org/content/article/fact-checking-judy-mikovits-controversial-virologist-attacking-anthony-fauci-viral
  10. Freeman, D., Waite, F., Rosebrock, L., Petit, A., Causier, C., East, A., Jenner, L., Teale, A.-L., Carr, L., Mulhall, S., Bold, E., & Lambe, S. (2022). Coronavirus conspiracy beliefs, mistrust, and compliance with government guidelines in England. Psychological Medicine, 52(2), 251–263. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291720001890
  11. Frenkel, S., Decker, B., & Alba, D. (2020, May 21). How the ‘Plandemic’ Movie and Its Falsehoods Spread Widely Online—The New York Times. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2020/05/20/technology/plandemic-movie-youtube-facebook-coronavirus.html
  12. Fricker, M. (1998). Rational Authority and Social Power: Towards a Truly Social Epistemology. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 98(2), 159–177. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9264.00030
  13. Gallagher, E. (2020, May 21). Facebook Groups and YouTube Enabled Viral Spread of ‘Plandemic’ Misinformation. OneZero. https://onezero.medium.com/facebook-groups-and-youtube-enabled-viral-spread-of-plandemic-misinformation-f1a279335e8c
  14. Gallagher, S., & Zahavi, D. (2010). The Phenomenological Mind: An Introduction to philosophy of mind and cognitive science. Routledge.
  15. Gauchat, G. (2012). Politicization of Science in the Public Sphere: A Study of Public Trust in the United States, 1974 to 2010. American Sociological Review, 77(2), 167–187. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122412438225
  16. Gugushvili, A., Koltai, J., Stuckler, D., & McKee, M. (2020). Votes, populism, and pandemics. International Journal of Public Health, 65(6), 721–722. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00038-020-01450-y
  17. Haelle, T. (2020, May 8). Why It’s Important To Push Back On ‘Plandemic’—And How To Do It. Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/tarahaelle/2020/05/08/why-its-important-to-push-back-on-plandemic-and-how-to-do-it/
  18. Harambam, J. (2020). Contemporary Conspiracy Culture: Truth and Knowledge in an Era of Epistemic Instability (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429327605
  19. Hardwig, J. (1991). The role of Trust in Knowledge. The Journal of Philosophy, LXXXVIII(12), 693–708. https://doi.org/10.2307/2027007
  20. Hofstadter, R. (1996). The Paranoid Style in American Politics. In The Paranoid Style in American Politics and Other Essays (pp. 3–40). Harvard University Press.
  21. Holton, R. (1994). Deciding to trust, coming to believe. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 72(1), 63–76. https://doi.org/10.1080/00048409412345881
  22. Husserl, E. (1960). Cartesian Meditations: An Introduction to Phenomenology (D. Cairns, Trans.). Springer.
  23. Husserl, E. (1970). The crisis of European sciences and transcendental phenomenology: An introduction to phenomenological philosophy (D. Carr, Trans.). Northwestern University Press.
  24. Husserl, E. (1973). Zur Phänomenologie der Intersubjektivität. Texte aus dem Nachlass Dritter Teil: 1929–1935 (I. Kern, Ed.). Martinus Nijhoff.
  25. Husserl, E. (1989). Ideas for a Pure Phenomenology and Phenomenological Philosophy. Second Book: Studies in the phenomenology of constitution (R. Rojcewicz & A. Schuwer, Trans.). Kluwer Academic.
  26. Husserl, E. (2001). Analyses Concerning Passive and Active Synthesis: Lectures on Transcendental Logic (A. J. Steinbock, Trans.). Springer Netherlands.
  27. Husserl, E. (2006). The Basic Problems of Phenomenology: From the Lectures, Winter Semester, 1910-1911 (I. Farin & J. G. Hart, Trans.). Springer. https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/1-4020-3789-9
  28. Ichino, A., & Räikkä, J. (2020). Non-doxastic conspiracy theories. Argumenta, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.14275/2465-2334/20200.ICH
  29. Jasanoff, S., Hilgartner, S., Hurlbut, J. B., Özgöde, O., & Rayzberg, M. (2021). Comparative Covid Response: Crisis, Knowledge, Politics (p. 121) [Interim Report]. https://ingsa.org/covidtag/covid-19-commentary/jasanoff-schmidt/
  30. Jaworsky, B. N. (2021). Everything’s going according to Plan(demic): A cultural sociological approach to conspiracy theorizing. American Journal of Cultural Sociology. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41290-021-00144-z
  31. Kattumana, T. (2022). Trust, Vaccine Hesitancy, and the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Phenomenological Perspective. Social Epistemology, 36(5), 641–655. https://doi.org/10.1080/02691728.2022.2115325
  32. Kattumana, T., & Byrne, T. (2023). On Dissent Against Public Health Interventions: A Phenomenological Perspective During the COVID-19 Pandemic. In T. Byrne & M. Wenning (Eds.), The Right to Resist: Philosophies of Dissent (pp. 207–233). Bloomsbury Press.
  33. Kearney, M. D., Chiang, S. C., & Massey, P. M. (2020). The Twitter origins and evolution of the COVID-19 “plandemic” conspiracy theory. Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review, 1(3). https://doi.org/10.37016/mr-2020-42
  34. Larson, H. J., Clarke, R. M., Jarrett, C., Eckersberger, E., Levine, Z., Schulz, W. S., & Paterson, P. (2018). Measuring trust in vaccination: A systematic review. Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics, 14(7), 1599–1609. https://doi.org/10.1080/21645515.2018.1459252
  35. Lasco, G. (2020). Medical populism and the COVID-19 pandemic. Global Public Health, 15(10), 1417–1429. https://doi.org/10.1080/17441692.2020.1807581
  36. Lewis, R. (2018). Alternative Influence: Broadcasting the Reactionary Right on YouTube (p. 61). Data & Society Research Institute. https://datasociety.net/library/alternative-influence/
  37. Lewis, R. (2020). “This Is What the News Won’t Show You”: YouTube Creators and the Reactionary Politics of Micro-celebrity. Television & New Media, 21(2), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/1527476419879919
  38. Luhmann, N. (1988). Familiarity, confidence, trust: Problems and alternatives. In D. Gambetta (Ed.), Trust: Making and Breaking Cooperative Relations (pp. 94–107). Basil Blackwell.
  39. Luhmann, N. (2017). Trust and Power (M. King & C. Morgner, Eds.; H. Davis, J. Raffan, & K. Rooney, Trans.). Polity.
  40. Lytvynenko, J. (2020, May 7). The “Plandemic” Video Has Exploded Online—And It Is Filled With Falsehoods. BuzzFeed News. https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/janelytvynenko/coronavirus-plandemic-viral-harmful-fauci-mikovits
  41. Marín-Ávila, E. (2021). Hope and Trust as Conditions for Rational Actions in Society: A Phenomenological Approach. Husserl Studies, 37(3), 229–247. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10743-021-09288-9
  42. Marres, N. (2018). Why We Can’t Have Our Facts Back. Engaging Science, Technology, and Society, 4, 423–443. https://doi.org/10.17351/ests2018.188
  43. Naughton, J. (2020, May 23). How the “Plandemic” conspiracy theory took hold. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2020/may/23/how-the-plandemic-conspiracy-theory-took-hold
  44. Nazar, S., & Pieters, T. (2021). Plandemic Revisited: A Product of Planned Disinformation Amplifying the COVID-19 “infodemic.” Frontiers in Public Health, 9, 649930. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2021.649930
  45. Neuman, S. (2020, May 8). Seen “Plandemic”? We Take A Close Look At The Viral Conspiracy Video’s Claims. https://text.npr.org/852451652
  46. Newton, C. (2020, May 12). How the ‘Plandemic’ video hoax went viral. The Verge. https://www.theverge.com/2020/5/12/21254184/how-plandemic-went-viral-facebook-youtube
  47. Nguyen, C. T. (2020). Echo Chambers and Epistemic Bubbles. Episteme, 17(2), 141–161. https://doi.org/10.1017/epi.2018.32
  48. Osler, L. (2021). Taking empathy online. Inquiry, 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020174X.2021.1899045
  49. Overgaard, S. (2018). What is Empathy. In F. Kjosavik, C. Beyer, & C. Fricke (Eds.), Husserl’s Phenomenology of Intersubjectivity: Historical Interpretations and Contemporary Applications (pp. 178–192). Routledge.
  50. Ozar, A. (2018). Trust as a moral emotion. In J. Drummond & S. Rinofner-Kreidl (Eds.), Emotional experiences: Ethical and social significance (pp. 137–153). Rowman & Littlefield.
  51. Petranovich, S. (2019). Trust and Betrayal from a Husserlian Standpoint. In M. Baghramian (Ed.), From trust to trustworthiness (pp. 117–140). Routledge.
  52. Prasad, A. (2021). Anti-science Misinformation and Conspiracies: COVID–19, Post-truth, and Science & Technology Studies (STS). Science, Technology and Society, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/09717218211003413
  53. Robinson, E., & Daly, M. (2020). Explaining the rise and fall of psychological distress during the COVID-19 crisis in the United States: Longitudinal evidence from the Understanding America Study. British Journal of Health Psychology, 26(2), 570–587. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjhp.12493
  54. Rolin, K. (2002). Gender and Trust in Science. Hypatia, 17(4), 95–120. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.2002.tb01075.x
  55. Romer, D., & Jamieson, K. H. (2020). Conspiracy theories as barriers to controlling the spread of COVID-19 in the U.S. Social Science & Medicine, 263, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113356
  56. Sabahelzain, M. M., Hartigan-Go, K., & Larson, H. J. (2021). The politics of Covid-19 vaccine confidence. Current Opinion in Immunology, 71, 92–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coi.2021.06.007
  57. Skwarecki, B. (2020, May 5). If You Found That ‘Plandemic’ Video Convincing, Read This Too. Lifehacker. https://lifehacker.com/if-you-found-that-plandemic-video-convincing-read-th-1843339002
  58. Twenge, J. M., & Joiner, T. E. (2020). U.S. Census Bureau-assessed prevalence of anxiety and depressive symptoms in 2019 and during the 2020 COVID-19 pandemic. Depression and Anxiety, 37(10), 954–956. https://doi.org/10.1002/da.23077
  59. Uscinski, J. E., Enders, A. M., Klofstad, C., Seelig, M., Funchion, J., Everett, C., Wuchty, S., Premaratne, K., & Murthi, M. (2020). Why do people believe COVID-19 conspiracy theories? Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review, 1(3). https://doi.org/10.37016/mr-2020-015
  60. van Prooijen, J.-W., & Douglas, K. M. (2017). Conspiracy theories as part of history: The role of societal crisis situations. Memory Studies, 10(3), 323–333. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750698017701615
  61. Whyte, K. P., & Crease, R. P. (2010). Trust, expertise, and the philosophy of science. Synthese, 177(3), 411–425. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-010-9786-3
  62. Willis, M. (Director). (2020, May 4). Plandemic: The Hidden Agenda Behind Covid-19. Elevate Films. https://freedomplatform.tv/plandemic-original-segment/