Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Journal of Digital Social Research

Research Articles

Vol. 5 No. 2 (2023): Blockchain Scenes

Women on the Block: A Technofeminist Discourse Analysis of Blockchain Meetups, Conferences, and Hackathons

DOI
https://doi.org/10.33621/jdsr.v5i2.138
Submitted
May 7, 2022
Published
2023-06-29

Abstract

In response to the stark gender disparity that plagued blockchain in its early days, a range of 'women in blockchain' initiatives emerged, some more effective than others. Blockchain scenes including 'meetups,' conferences, and hackathons, present ideal sites to observe these tensions. This study is a technofeminist discourse analysis based on participant observations at blockchain events and interviews with women who work in the industry. It demonstrates how women’s participation in various blockchain scenes can be enabling or constraining depending on the gender power relations of the event. I propose three discursive frames for analyzing these scenes: (1) gender-blind meritocracy, (2) lean into blockchain, and (3) intersectional inclusion.

References

  1. Adams, P. R., Frizzo-Barker, J., Ackah, B., & Chow-White, P. A. (2019). Meetups: Making space for women on the blockchain. In M. Ragnedda & G. Destefanis (Eds.), Blockchain and Web 3.0: Social, Economic, and Technological Challenges (pp. 48–61). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429029530
  2. Ahmed, S. (2012). On Being Included: Racism and Diversity in Institutional Life (Illustrated edition). Duke Univ Pr.
  3. Ahmed, S. (2015). Introduction: Sexism - A Problem with a Name. New Formations: A Journal of Culture/Theory/Politics, 86(1), 5–13.
  4. Ahmed, S. (2017). Living a Feminist Life. Duke University Press.
  5. Banerjee, D. (2022, April 19). Inside crypto’s hiring spree: A ‘Wild West’ search for talent with one big problem [LinkedIn]. https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/inside-cryptos-hiring-spree-wild-west-search-talent-banerjee-cfa/
  6. Banet-Weiser, S. (2018). Empowered: Popular Feminism and Popular Misogyny. Duke University Press.
  7. Barrett, M. (2014). Women’s Oppression Today: The Marxist/feminist Encounter. Verso Books.
  8. Baym, N., Swartz, L., & Alarcon, A. (2019). Convening Technologies: Blockchain and the Music Industry. International Journal of Communication, 13(0), 402–421.
  9. Begeny, C. T., Ryan, M. K., Moss-Racusin, C. A., & Ravetz, G. (2020). In some professions, women have become well represented, yet gender bias persists—Perpetuated by those who think it is not happening. Science Advances, 6(26), eaba7814. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aba7814
  10. Benjamin, R. (2019). Race after Technology: Abolitionist tools for the New Jim Code. Polity.
  11. Benkler, Y. (2006). The Wealth of Networks: How Social Production Transforms Markets and Freedom. Yale University Press.
  12. Blum, A. (2001). Scenes. Public, 7–35.
  13. Bobel, C. (2007). “I’m not an activist, though I’ve done a lot of it”: Doing Activism, Being Activist and the “Perfect Standard” in a Contemporary Movement. Social Movement Studies, 6(2), 147–159. https://doi.org/10.1080/14742830701497277
  14. Boczkowski, P., & Lievrouw, L. A. (2008). Bridging STS and communication studies: Scholarship on media and information technologies. In E. J. Hackett, O. Amsterdamska, M. Lynch, & J. Wajcman (Eds.), The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies (pp. 949–977). MIT Press.
  15. Bourke, J., & Espedido, A. (2019, March 29). Why Inclusive Leaders Are Good for Organizations, and How to Become One. Harvard Business Review. Retrieved from https://hbr.org/2019/03/why-inclusive-leaders-are-good-for-organizations-and-how-to-become-one
  16. Bowles, N. (2018, February 25). Women in Cryptocurrencies Push Back Against ‘Blockchain Bros.’ New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/02/25/business/cryptocurrency-women-blockchain-bros.html
  17. Brooke, S. (2020). Breaking gender code: Visibility, power, and gender in creative coding cultures [University of Oxford]. https://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:76f836bf-880b-4902-9226-8d668726f4cf
  18. Carter, A., Croft, A., Lukas, D., & Sandstrom, G. (2018). Women’s visibility in academic seminars: Women ask fewer questions than men. PLOS ONE, 13(9), e0202743. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0202743
  19. Casemajor, N., & Straw, W. (2017). The Visuality Of Scenes: Urban Cultures And Visual Scenescapes. Imaginations: Journal of Cross-Cultural Image Studies, 7(2), 4–19.
  20. Castells, M. (2000). The Rise of the Network Society: The Information Age: Economy, Society, and Culture. Blackwell.
  21. Castells, M. (2001). The Internet Galaxy: Reflections on the Internet, Business, and Society. Oxford University Press.
  22. Castilla, E. J., & Benard, S. (2010). The Paradox of Meritocracy in Organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 55(4), 543–576.
  23. Cho, S., Crenshaw, K. W., & McCall, L. (2013). Toward a Field of Intersectionality Studies: Theory, Applications, and Praxis. Signs, 38(4), 785–810.
  24. Christensen, C. M., Raynor, M. E., & McDonald, R. (2015). What Is Disruptive Innovation? Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2015/12/what-is-disruptive-innovation
  25. Cockburn, C., & Ormrod, S. (1993). Gender and technology in the making. Sage Publications.
  26. Coin Dance. (2022, March). Bitcoin Community Engagement by Gender Summary. Coin Dance. https://coin.dance/stats#demographics
  27. Coleman, G., & Jandri?, P. (2019). Postdigital Anthropology: Hacks, Hackers, and the Human Condition. Postdigital Science and Education, 1(2), 525–550. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-019-00065-8
  28. Correll, S. J. (2017). SWS 2016 Feminist Lecture: Reducing Gender Biases In Modern Workplaces: A Small Wins Approach to Organizational Change. Gender & Society, 31(6), 725–750. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243217738518
  29. Cottom, T. M. (2017). Black cyberfeminisms: Ways forward for intersectionality and digital sociology. In D. Jessie, G. Karen, & T. M. Cottom (Eds.), Digitized institutions (pp. 211–230). Policy Press.
  30. Crenshaw, K. (1990). Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence against Women of Color. Stanford Law Review, 43, 1241.
  31. Cuen, L. (2018, December 31). Bitcoin’s Warrior Queen: How Lightning’s Elizabeth Stark Raised an Army. CoinDesk. https://www.coindesk.com/coindesk-most-influential-blockchain-2018-elizabeth-stark
  32. Custer, C. (2018). Blockchain’s Gender Divide: A Data Story—Longhash. https://en.longhash.com/news/blockchains-gender-divide-a-data-story
  33. De Hertogh, L. B., Lane, L., & Ouellette, J. (2019). “Feminist Leanings:” Tracing Technofeminist and Intersectional Practices and Values in Three Decades of Computers and Composition. Computers and Composition, 51, 4–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2018.11.004
  34. Dennissen, M., Benschop, Y., & van den Brink, M. (2020). Rethinking Diversity Management: An Intersectional Analysis of Diversity Networks. Organization Studies, 41(2), 219–240. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840618800103
  35. Dunbar-Hester, C. (2014). Low Power to the People: Pirates, Protest, and Politics in FM Radio Activism. The MIT Press.
  36. Dunbar-Hester, C. (2020). Hacking Diversity: The Politics of Inclusion in Open Technology Cultures. Princeton University Press.
  37. Elizabeth, K. (2018, June 26). Crypto Is Booming. But Where Are The Women? Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/katieelizabeth1/2018/06/26/crypto-is-booming-where-are-the-women/#33206c7b1a3f
  38. Ensmenger, N. (2012). The Computer Boys Take Over: Computers, Programmers, and the Politics of Technical Expertise (pp. x, 320). The MIT Press.
  39. Eswaran, V. (2019). The business case for diversity is now overwhelming. Here’s why. Retrieved from World Economic Forum website: https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2019/04/business-case-for-diversity-in-the-workplace/
  40. Eubanks, V. (2018). Automating Inequality: How High-Tech Tools Profile, Police, and Punish the Poor. New York, NY: St. Martin’s Press.
  41. Faludi, S. (2013). Facebook Feminism, Like It or Not. The Baffler, 23, 34–51.
  42. Faulkner, W. (2009). Doing gender in engineering workplace cultures: Gender in/authenticity and the in/visibility paradox. Engineering Studies, 1(3), 169–189. https://doi.org/10.1080/19378620903225059
  43. Finneman, T., & Volz, Y. (2020). Leading the second wave into the third wave: U.S. women journalists and discursive continuity of feminism. Feminist Media Studies, 20(6), 863–878. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2019.1644658
  44. Fraser, N. (2013). Fortunes of Feminism: From State-Managed Capitalism to Neoliberal Crisis: Verso; https://www.amazon.ca/Fortunes-Feminism-State-Managed-Capitalism-Neoliberal/dp/1844679845.
  45. Fuchs, C. (2013). Social Media: A Critical Introduction. SAGE.
  46. Gamerman, E. (2022, March 11). Reese Witherspoon and Gwyneth Paltrow Push for Crypto Sisterhood. Wall Street Journal. https://www.wsj.com/articles/reese-witherspoon-and-gwyneth-paltrow-push-for-crypto-sisterhood-11647017051
  47. Gerson, J. M., & Peiss, K. (1985). Boundaries, Negotiation, Consciousness: Reconceptualizing Gender Relations. Social Problems, 32(4), 317–331. https://doi.org/10.2307/800755
  48. Gill, R. (2009). Mediated intimacy and postfeminism: A discourse analytic examination of sex and relationships advice in a women’s magazine. Discourse & Communication, 3(4), 345–369. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481309343870
  49. Gill, R. (2011). Sexism Reloaded, or, it’s Time to get Angry Again! Feminist Media Studies, 11(1), 61–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2011.537029
  50. Gill, R. (2018). Discourse analysis in media and communications research. In M. Kackman & M. C. Kearney (Eds.), The Craft of Criticism: Critical Media Studies in Practice. Routledge.
  51. Green, D. J. (2018, October 10). We Need More Female Programmers In Blockchain. Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/jemmagreen/2018/10/10/we-need-more-female-programmers-in-blockchain/
  52. Griffith, E. (2018). For Women in Cryptocurrency, a New Effort to Grow Their Ranks. WIRED. https://www.wired.com/story/for-women-in-cryptocurrency-a-new-effort-to-grow-their-ranks/
  53. Hall, S. (1980). Encoding/Decoding. In S. Hall, D. Hobson, A. Lowe, & P. Willis (Eds.), Culture, Media, Language: Working Papers in Cultural Studies, 1972-79 (pp. 117–127). Hutchinson.
  54. Haraway, D. (1988). Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective. Feminist Studies, 14(3), 575–599. https://doi.org/10.2307/3178066
  55. Haraway, D. J. (1997). Modest?Witness@Second?Millennium.FemaleMan?Meets?OncoMouse: Feminism and Technoscience. Routledge.
  56. Hardey, M. (2019). The Culture of Women in Tech: An Unsuitable Job for a Woman (1st ed.). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
  57. Heywood, L. (2006). The women’s movement today: An encyclopedia of third-wave feminism. Greenwood Press.
  58. Hicks, M. (2017). Programmed inequality: How Britain discarded women technologists and lost its edge in computing. MIT Press.
  59. Hughes, T. P. (1993). Networks of Power: Electrification in Western Society, 1880-1930 (Revised edition). Johns Hopkins Univ Pr.
  60. Jackson, I. (2019). Bitcoin & Black America. Independently published.
  61. Jenkins, H. (2006). Convergence Culture: Where Old and New Media Collide. NYU Press.
  62. Joseph, C. (2013). Leveraging a women’s network to attract, develop and retain high potential female talent. Strategic HR Review, 12(3), 132–137. https://doi.org/10.1108/14754391311324480
  63. Kennedy, S. (2013). Marxism and Feminism in an Age of Neoliberalism. Irish Marxist Review, 2(7), 5–16.
  64. Kostecki, J. (2019, May 22). Thoughts on Diversity, Inclusion and Accessibility for Massive Adoption in Memphis. Medium. https://medium.com/@jacob_kostecki/thoughts-on-diversity-inclusion-and-accessibility-for-massive-adoption-in-memphis-db0bd8f2a2a1
  65. Landström, C. (2007). Queering feminist technology studies. Feminist Theory, 8(1), 7–26.
  66. Lievrouw, L. A., & Livingstone, S. M. (Eds.). (2006). Handbook of New Media: Student Edition. Sage Publications.
  67. MacKenzie, D. A., & Wajcman, J. (1999). Introductory essay: The social shaping of technology. In The Social Shaping of Technology (2nd ed., pp. 3–26). Open University Press.
  68. Marcus, G. (2011). Multi-sited Ethnography: Five or Six Things I Know About it Now. In S. Coleman & P. V. Hellermann (Eds.), Multi-sited Ethnography: Problems and Possibilities in the Translocation of Research Methods (pp. 16–32). Routledge.
  69. Marcus, G. E. (1995). Ethnography in/of the World System: The Emergence of Multi-Sited Ethnography. Annual Review of Anthropology, 24, 95–117.
  70. McCall, L. (2005). The Complexity of Intersectionality. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 30(3), 1771–1800. https://doi.org/10.1086/426800
  71. McDowell, C. (2016). Micro-inclusion: A small step to include someone. Interaction Institute for Social Change. http://interactioninstitute.org/micro-inclusion-a-small-step-to-include-someone/
  72. McRobbie, A. (2008). The Aftermath of Feminism: Gender, Culture and Social Change. SAGE Publications.
  73. Miller, N. (2019, February 21). She(256) wants to disrupt the male dominated field of blockchain. Newsweek. https://www.newsweek.com/2019/03/08/she256-disrupt-male-dominated-tech-blockchain-1339553.html
  74. Miyata, K., Boase, J., Wellman, B., & Ikeda, K. (2005). The mobile-izing Japanese. In M. Ito, D. Okabe, & M. Matsuda (Eds.), Personal, Portable, Pedestrian: Mobile Phones in Japanese Life (pp. 143–164). MIT Press.
  75. Morozov, E. (2013). To Save Everything, Click Here: The Folly of Technological Solutionism. PublicAffairs.
  76. Mougayar, W., & Buterin, V. (2016). The Business Blockchain: Promise, Practice, and Application of the Next Internet Technology. Wiley.
  77. Moy, J. (2018, May 6). Bitcoin Bros, Meet the Women On The Block. Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/jamiemoy/2018/05/06/bitcoin-bros-meet-the-women-on-the-block/
  78. Nakamoto, S. (2009, May 24). Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System. https://web.archive.org/web/20140320135003/https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf
  79. Nash, J. C. (2008). Re-Thinking Intersectionality. Feminist Review, 89(1), 1–15.
  80. Neff, G. (2012). Venture Labor: Work and the Burden of Risk in Innovative Industries. MIT Press.
  81. Noble, S. U. (2018). Algorithms of Oppression: How Search Engines Reinforce Racism. New York: NYU Press.
  82. Ogundei, O. (2016, July 6). It’s a Man’s World: Only 1.76% of Bitcoin Community Are Women. Cointelegraph. Coin Telegraph
  83. Peck, M. (2019, March 8). Cryptocurrency Is Not Just a Boys’ Club. Glamour. https://www.glamour.com/story/meet-the-women-of-cryptocurrency
  84. Perez, C. C. (2019). Invisible Women: Data Bias in a World Designed for Men (First Printing edition). Harry N. Abrams.
  85. Petrucci, L. (2020). Theorizing postfeminist communities: How gender-inclusive meetups address gender inequity in high-tech industries. Gender, Work & Organization, 27(4), 545–564. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12440
  86. Pinch, T., & Bijker, W. E. (1987). The Social Construction of Facts and Artifacts: Or How the Sociology of Science and the Sociology of Technology Might Benefit From Each Other. In W. E. Bijker, T. P. Hughes, T. Pinch, & D. G. Douglas (Eds.), The Social Construction of Technological Systems: New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology (pp. 17–51). MIT Press.
  87. Plant, S. (1997). Zeros + Ones: Digital Women + the New Technoculture. Fourth Estate.
  88. Primack, D. (2018, January 26). Bitcoin conference ends at a strip club. Axios. https://www.axios.com/bitcoin-conference-stripclub-1516983254-35e78aad-ee30-4872-bfe6-13190dd46061.html
  89. Rainie, L., & Wellman, B. (2012). Networked: The New Social Operating System. MIT Press.
  90. Rakow, L. F. (1986). Rethinking Gender Research in Communication. Journal of Communication, 36(4), 11–26. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1986.tb01447.x
  91. Saldana, J. (2015). The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers. SAGE.
  92. Sandberg, S. (2013). Lean In: Women, Work, and the Will to Lead. Random House.
  93. Savi?, S., & Wuschitz, S. (2018). Feminist Hackerspace as a Place of Infrastructure Production. https://scholarsbank.uoregon.edu/xmlui/handle/1794/26790
  94. Schultze, U., & Orlikowski, W. J. (2001). Metaphors of virtuality: Shaping an emergent reality. Information and Organization, 11(1), 45–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1471-7727(00)00003-8
  95. Sessions, L. F. (2010). How Offline Gatherings Affect Online Communities. Information, Communication & Society, 13(3), 375–395. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691180903468954
  96. Shen, C., & Cage, C. (2013). Exodus to the real world? Assessing the impact of offline meetups on community participation and social capital. New Media & Society, 17(3), 393–414.
  97. Silverstone, R. (2002). Complicity and Collusion in the Mediation of Everyday Life. New Literary History, 33(4), 761–780.
  98. Star, S. L. (1999). The Ethnography of Infrastructure. American Behavioral Scientist, 43(3), 377–391. https://doi.org/10.1177/00027649921955326
  99. Straw, W. (2015). Some Things a Scene Might Be. Cultural Studies, 29(3), 476–485. https://doi.org/10.1080/09502386.2014.937947
  100. Swan, M. (2015). Blockchain: Blueprint for a New Economy. O’Reilly Media.
  101. Szulc, L. (2020). Digital Gender Disidentifications: Beyond the Subversion Versus Hegemony Dichotomy and Toward Everyday Gender Practices. International Journal of Communication, 14.
  102. Tapscott, D., & Tapscott, A. (2016). Blockchain Revolution: How the Technology Behind Bitcoin Is Changing Money, Business, and the World. Portfolio.
  103. Tulshyan, R. (2016). The Diversity Advantage: Fixing Gender Inequality in The Workplace. CreateSpace Independent Publishing.
  104. Turkle, S. (1995). Life on the Screen. Touchstone.
  105. Vigna, P., & Casey, M. J. (2016). The Age of Cryptocurrency: How Bitcoin and the Blockchain Are Challenging the Global Economic Order (Reprint edition). Picador.
  106. Wajcman, J. (1991). Feminism Confronts Technology. Penn State Press.
  107. Wajcman, J. (2004). TechnoFeminism. Polity.
  108. Wajcman, J. (2007). From Women and Technology to Gendered Technoscience. Information, Communication & Society, 10(3), 287–298. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691180701409770
  109. Wellman, B., Quan-Haase, A., Boase, J., Chen, W., Hampton, K., Díaz, I., & Miyata, K. (2003). The Social Affordances of the Internet for Networked Individualism. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 8(3).
  110. Woo, B., Rennie, J., & Poyntz, S. R. (2015). Scene Thinking. Cultural Studies, 29(3), 285–297. https://doi.org/10.1080/09502386.2014.937950
  111. Worth, A., Augoustinos, M., & Hastie, B. (2015). “Playing the gender card”: Media representations of Julia Gillard’s sexism and misogyny speech. Feminism & Psychology, 52–72.
  112. Yang, Y., Chawla, N. V., & Uzzi, B. (2019). A network’s gender composition and communication pattern predict women’s leadership success. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(6), 2033–2038. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1721438116