Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Articles

Vol. 3 No. 2 (2021)

Does Numeracy in Digital Journalism Increase Story Believability? : Experiments Comparing Audience Perceptions from the US, Zambia, Tanzania

DOI
https://doi.org/10.33621/jdsr.v3i2.73
Submitted
February 11, 2021
Published
2021-09-02

Abstract

This exploratory study contributes to the literature on numeracy in digital journalism studies by theoretically incorporating the audience/news consumers. While most studies have focused on journalists’ perception and role in the use of numeracy, this study examines how audience perceive stories with numerical values. Through an experimental design, and by comparing the United States, Zambia, and Tanzania, the study was able to demonstrate that news stories with numerical values diminished audience/readers’ affective consumption. In other words, news stories with numerical values were negatively associated with audience appeal. However, individuals with a lower understanding of probabilistic and numerical concepts seemed to trust news stories with numbers more than those with a higher level of numeracy. This was especially true in Zambia and Tanzania where most participants recorded lower numeracy levels. The overall sample in all the three countries seemed to favor news stories with less or no numeracy.

References

  1. Appelgren, E., & Nygren, G. (2014). Data Journalism in Sweden: Introducing new methods and genres of journalism into “old” organizations. Digital Journalism, 2(3), 394-405. doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2014.884344
  2. Ashby, N. J. (2017). Numeracy predicts preference consistency: Deliberative search heuristics increase choice consistency for choices from description and experience. Judgment and Decision making, 12(2), 128.
  3. Ausserhofer, J., Gutounig, R., Oppermann, M., Matiasek, S., & Goldgruber, E. (2020). The datafication of data journalism scholarship: Focal points, methods, and research propositions for the investigation of data-intensive newswork. Journalism, 21(7), 950-973. doi.org/10.1177/1464884917700667
  4. Bodrunova, S. S., Blekanov, I. S., & Maksimov, A. (2016, November). Measuring influencers in Twitter ad-hoc discussions: active users vs. internal networks in the discourse on Biryuliovo bashings in 2013. In 2016 IEEE Artificial Intelligence and Natural Language Conference (AINL) (pp. 1-10). IEEE.
  5. Borges-Rey, E. (2016). Unravelling data journalism: A study of data journalism practice in British newsrooms. Journalism Practice, 10(7), 833-843. doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2016.1159921
  6. Brand*, R. (2008). The numbers game: A case study of mathematical literacy at a South African newspaper. Communicatio: South African Journal for Communication Theory and Research, 34(2), 210-221. doi.org/10.1080/02500160802456155
  7. Cassidy, William P. "Online news credibility: An examination of the perceptions of newspaper journalists." Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 12.2 (2007): 478-498. doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00334.x
  8. Coddington, M. (2015). Clarifying journalism’s quantitative turn: A typology for evaluating data journalism, computational journalism, and computer-assisted reporting. Digital journalism, 3(3), 331-348. doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2014.976400
  9. Crettaz von Roten, F. (2016). Statistics in Public Understanding of Science review: How to achieve high statistical standards? Public Understanding of Science, 25(2), 135-140. doi.org/10.1177/0963662515595195
  10. De Beer, A.S. and E. Steyn. 2002. Sanef’s ‘2002 South African national journalism skills audit’. Ecquid Novi 23(1): 11–86. doi.org/10.1080/02560054.2002.10798725
  11. Diakopoulos, N., & Koliska, M. (2017). Algorithmic transparency in the news media. Digital Journalism, 5(7), 809-828. doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2016.1208053
  12. Ekström, M., & Westlund, O. (2019). The dislocation of news journalism: A conceptual framework for the study of epistemologies of digital journalism. Media and Communication, 7(1), 259-270. doi.org/10.17645/mac.v7i1.1763
  13. Ferrucci, P. (2020). It is in the numbers: How market orientation impacts journalists’ use of news metrics. Journalism, 21(2), 244-261. doi.org/10.1177/1464884918807056
  14. Ferrucci, P., & Vos, T. (2017). Who’s in, who’s out? Constructing the identity of digital journalists. Digital Journalism, 5(7), 868-883. doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2016.1208054
  15. Fisher, J., & Hopp, T. (2020). Does the Framing of Transparency Impact Trust? Differences Between Self-Benefit and Other-Benefit Message Frames. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 14(3), 203-222. doi.org/10.1080/1553118X.2020.1770767
  16. Franklin, B. (2014). The Future of Journalism: In an age of digital media and economic uncertainty. Journalism Studies, 15(5), 481-499, DOI: 10.1080/1461670X.2014.930254
  17. Genis, A. (2001). Numbers count: the importance of numeracy for journalists (Doctoral dissertation, Stellenbosch: Stellenbosch University).
  18. Gondwe, G., & White, R. A. (2021). Data Journalism Practice in Sub-Saharan African Media Systems: A Cross-National Survey of Journalists’ Perceptions in Zambia and Tanzania. African Journalism Studies, 1-16.
  19. Gondwe, G., Muchangwe, R., & Mwaya, J. E. (2021). Motivations for Social Media Use and Consumption in Zambian Online Platforms. In Analyzing Global Social Media Consumption (pp. 204-215). IGI Global. DOI: 10.4018/978-1-7998-4718-2.ch011
  20. Gondwe, G. (2021). News worthiness and Public trust in sub-Sahara African: Examining the impact of tabloid journalism in Zambia. Journal of Media and Communication Studies, 13(1), 12-22. doi.org/10.5897/JMCS2020.0720
  21. Gondwe, G. (2018). News Believability & Trustworthiness on African Online Networks: An Experimental Design. International Communication Research Journal, 53(2), 51-74.
  22. Gray, J., Chambers, L., & Bounegru, L. (2012). The data journalism handbook: How journalists can use data to improve the news. O'Reilly Media, Inc.
  23. Harrison, S. (2020). A Study into the Value Placed on Numeracy as Symbolic Capital Within the Journalistic Field (Doctoral dissertation, Liverpool John Moores University).
  24. Hopp, T. (2015). The effect of numeracy on the relationship between state reactance and message evaluations. Communication Research Reports, 32(4), 314-321. doi.org/10.1080/08824096.2015.1089855
  25. Jones, J., & Salter, L. (2011). Digital journalism. Sage.
  26. Kawamoto, K. (Ed.). (2003). Digital journalism: Emerging media and the changing horizons of journalism. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
  27. Kerunga, J., Rowe, E., & Gondwe, G. (2020). Journalism Credibility in the digital age–Examining shifts in paradigms. Available at SSRN 3641943.
  28. Lecheler, S., & Kruikemeier, S. (2016). Re-evaluating journalistic routines in a digital age: A review of research on the use of online sources. New media & society, 18(1), 156-171. doi.org/10.1177/1461444815600412
  29. Len-Ríos, M. E., & Hinnant, A. (2014). Health literacy and numeracy: A comparison of magazine health messages. Howard Journal of Communications, 25(3), 235-256. doi.org/10.1080/10646175.2014.922909
  30. Lipkus, I. M., Samsa, G., & Rimer, B. K. (2001). General performance on a numeracy scale among highly educated samples. Medical decision making, 21(1), 37-44. doi.org/10.1177/0272989X0102100105
  31. Maier, S. R. (2003). Numeracy in the newsroom: A case study of mathematical competence and confidence. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 80(4), 921-936. doi.org/10.1177/107769900308000411
  32. Molyneux, L., & Coddington, M. (2020). Aggregation, clickbait and their effect on perceptions of journalistic credibility and quality. Journalism Practice, 14(4), 429-446. doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2019.1628658
  33. Nguyen, A. (Ed.). (2017). News, numbers and public opinion in a data-driven world. Bloomsbury Publishing USA.
  34. Nguyen, A., & Lugo-Ocando, J. (2016). The state of data and statistics in journalism and journalism education: Issues and debates. Journalism, 17(1), 3-17. doi.org/10.1177/1464884915593234
  35. Peters, E. (2020). Innumeracy in the wild: Misunderstanding and misusing numbers. Oxford University Press.
  36. Pickard, Victor, and Alex T. Williams. 2014. “Salvation or Folly? The Promise and Perils of Digital Paywalls.” Digital Journalism 2(2): 195–213. doi:10.1080/21670811.2013.865967.
  37. Riggs, T. S. (2017). Using Experimental Design to Test the Effect of Campaign Donation Knowledge on Interpersonal Political Trust in the United States (Doctoral dissertation, Central European University).
  38. Stalph, F., & Borges-Rey, E. (2018). Data journalism sustainability: An outlook on the future of data-driven reporting. Digital Journalism, 6(8), 1078-1089. doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2018.1503060
  39. Tiede, K. E., Bjälkebring, P., & Peters, E. (2020). Numeracy, numeric attention, and number use. http://www.sjdm.org/presentations/2020-Poster-Tiede-Kevin_E.-Numeracy-Attention-NumberUse~.pdf. Retrieved, December 12th, 2020.
  40. Vis, Farida. 2013. “Twitter as a Reporting Tool for Breaking News: Journalists Tweeting the 2011 UK Riots.” Digital Journalism 1(1): 27–47. doi:10.1080/21670811.2012.741316.
  41. Westlund, Oscar. 2013. “Mobile News: A Review and Model of Journalism in an Age of Mobile Media.” Digital Journalism 1(1): 6–26. doi:10.1080/21670811.2012.740273.