Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Journal of Digital Social Research

Special Issue on Methods in Visual Politics and Protest

Vol. 6 No. 1 (2024): Special issue: Methods in Visual Politics and Protest: Mixed Methods, Data Curation & Anti-Publics

Networked masterplots : Music, pro-Russian sentiment, and participatory propaganda on TikTok

DOI
https://doi.org/10.33621/jdsr.v6i1.201
Submitted
April 29, 2023
Published
2024-03-06

Abstract

This article investigates engagement with propagandist TikTok videos shortly after Russia’s invasion of Ukraine on February 24, 2022, with particular attention to the role of music and comments. By repurposing the infrastructure of TikTok sound-linking, our research upholds sensitivity to how this infrastructure enables affective and participatory workings of propaganda. We develop the notion of networked masterplots based on a situated analysis of how a specific sound, occasionally used in combination with pro-Russian hashtags, prescribes the creation of replicable linkages between three distinct video templates. The analysed templates, as we will show, not only intentionally share the use of the same song but adapt the theatrical effect of situation and suspense on the textual level of “stickers” or messages overlaid on top of videos. A selection of fifteen videos using the stickers – “What if they attack?”, “I am wondering how many will (un)subscribe?”, and “I am (not) ashamed” – in combination with a techno remix of the Soviet folk song Katyusha will be at the centre of our investigation. Arguing that in Katyusha videos situation and suspense are indivisible, we pay attention to the audiencing practices as they extend into both video comment sections and further memetic spin-offs. We conclude by reflecting on how TikTok sharing not only facilitates self-expression and social activism but also enables the weaponization of content within networked memetic environments.

References

  1. Abidin, C. (2021). Mapping internet celebrity on TikTok: Exploring attention economies and visibility labours. Cultural Science Journal, 12(1), 77-103.
  2. Abidin, C. & Kaye, B. (2021). “Audio Memes, Earworms, and Templatability: The ‘Aural Turn’ of Memes on TikTok.” In C. Arkenbout, J. Wilson & D. de Zeeuw (Eds.) Critical Meme Reader: Global Mutations of the Viral Image (pp. 58-68). Institute of Network Cultures: Amsterdam.
  3. Ahmed, S. (2014). Cultural politics of emotion. Edinburgh University Press.
  4. Bradshaw, J. L. (2018). Slow Circulation: The Ethics of Speed and Rhetorical Persistence. Rhetoric Society Quarterly, 48(5), 479-498.
  5. Bradshaw, J. L. (2020). Rhetorical Exhaustion & the Ethics of Amplification. Computers and Composition, 56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2020.102568.
  6. Boler, & Davis, E. (2020). Affective politics of digital media: propaganda by other means (Boler & E. Davis, Eds.). Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
  7. Boutet, I., LeBlanc, M., Chamberland, J. A., & Collin, C. A. (2021). Emojis influence emotional communication, social attributions, and information processing. Computers in Human Behavior, 119, 106722.
  8. Colombo, G., Bounegru, L., & Gray, J. (2023). Visual Models for Social Media Image Analysis: Groupings, Engagement, Trends, and Rankings. International Journal of Communication, 17, 28.
  9. Dean, J. (2021). Preface. In: Boler, M. & E. Davis (Eds.) Affective politics of digital media: propaganda by other means. Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
  10. Finnin, R. & Roozenbeek, J. (2022). The Real Goal of Kremlin Disinformation Isn’t What You Think. Available at: https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2022/03/22/putin-disinformation-apathy-00018974
  11. Frosh, P. (2012). The showing of sharedness: Monstration, media and social life. Divinatio, (35), 123-138.
  12. Geboers, M. (2022). The Social Visuality of Distant Suffering.Doctoral Dissertation. University of Amsterdam. UvA DARE repository: The social visuality of distant suffering (uva.nl)
  13. Gerbaudo, P. (2016). From Data Analytics to Data Hermeneutics. Online Political Discussions, Digital Methods and the Continuing Relevance of Interpretive Approaches. Digital Culture & Society, 2(2), 95-112. https://doi.org/10.14361/dcs-2016-0207
  14. Gorobets, K. (2022). Russian “Special Military Operation” and the Language of Empire. Retrieved from: https://opiniojuris.org/2022/05/24/russian-special-military-operation-and-the-language-of-empire/
  15. Hagen, S., & Venturini, T. (2022). Memecry: Tracing the Repetition-with-Variation of Formulas on 4chan/pol. Available at SSRN.
  16. Hautea, S., Parks, P., Takahashi, B., & Zeng, J. (2021). Showing they care (or don’t): Affective publics and ambivalent climate activism on TikTok. Social Media + Society, 7(2), 20563051211012344.
  17. Hennion, A. (2003). “Music and Mediation: Toward a New Sociology of Music.” In The Cultural Study of Music: A Critical Introduction, edited by M. Clayton, T. Herbert, and R. Middleton, 80–91. London: Routledge.
  18. Hobbs, R. (2020). Propaganda in an age of algorithmic personalization: Expanding literacy research and practice. Reading Research Quarterly, 55(3), 521-533.
  19. Jones, A.H. (2017). Music and Propaganda. Retrieved from: https://drjonesmusic.me/2017/03/27/music-and-propaganda-online-discussion-8/
  20. Kahn, D. (2001) Noise Water Meat: A History of Sound in the Arts. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. —(2009) ‘Alvin Lucier: I am Sitting in a Room, Immersed and Propagated.’ OASE, 78, 24–7
  21. Kremlin.ru. (2021). ”On the Historical Unity of Russians and Ukrainians”. Retrieved from: http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/news/66181
  22. Light, B.; Burgess, J.; Duguay, S. (2018). The walkthrough method: An approach to the study of apps. New Media & Society, 20(3), 881–900. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816675438
  23. Lucier, A. (1980) Music for Pure Waves, Bass Drums and Acoustic Pendulums [Score]. Frankfurt: Material Press.Lucier, A. (1995) Reflections: Interviews, Scores, Writings, 1965–1994. Köln: MusikTexte.
  24. Luckert, S; Bachrach, S. (2009). The State of Deception. The Power of Nazi Propaganda. W.W. Norton & Company.
  25. Mäkelä, M. (2021). Viral Storytelling as Contemporary Narrative Didacticism: Deriving Universal Truths from Arbitrary Narratives of Personal Experience. In S. Lindberg, & H-R. Roine (Eds.), The Ethos of Digital Environments: Technology, Literary Theory and Philosophy (pp. 49-59). Routledge.
  26. Manovich, L. (2009). Metadata, mon amour. Re-action: The digital archive experience, 239. Retrieved from: http://manovich.net/index.php/projects/metadata-mon-amour
  27. Paasonen, S. (2015). “A Midsummer's Bonfire: Affective Intensities of Online Debate.” In K. Hillis, S. Paasonen, M. Petit, Networked Affect, (pp.27-42). MIT Press.
  28. Paasonen, S. (2019). Resonant Networks. In A. Fleig & Von Scheve, E. (Eds.) Public spheres of resonance: Constellations of affect and language, 49-62. Routledge.
  29. Papacharissi, Z. (2014). Affective Publics: Sentiment, Technology, and Politics. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199999736.001.0001
  30. Peeters, S. (2021). Digital Methods Initiative: Zeeschuimer. Retrieved from: https://github.com/digitalmethodsinitiative/zeeschuimer
  31. Pilipets, E. (2023). Hashtagging, Duetting, Sound-Linking: TikTok Gestures and Methods of (In)Distinction. MAST, 4(1), 109-135.
  32. Pilipets, E., Geboers, M. (2024 forthcoming). Brake the Meme Machine: Slow Circulation, ‘Z’ Gesture, and Pro-War Propaganda on TikTok. In Critical Meme Reader III. Breaking the Meme, edited by C. Arkenbout, I. Galip, Amsterdam: Institute of Network Cultures.
  33. Reagle, J. M. (2015). Reading the comments: Likers, haters, and manipulators at the bottom of the web. Mit Press.
  34. Romele, S. M., & Furia, P. 2020. Digital hermeneutics: from interpreting with machines to interpretational machines. AI & Society, 35(1), 73–86. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-018-0856-2
  35. Rose, G. (2022). Visual methodologies: An introduction to researching with visual materials. Visual (1-100). London SAGE.
  36. Rieder, B. (2015). Text Analysis. Available at: Research Software by Bernhard Rieder (polsys.net)
  37. Rogers, R. (2019). Doing Digital Methods. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
  38. Stark, L., & Crawford, K. (2015). The conservatism of emoji: Work, affect, and communication. Social Media + Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305115604853
  39. Thompson, M., & Biddle, I. (Eds.). (2013). Sound, music, affect: Theorizing sonic experience. A&C Black.
  40. Treem, J. W., Leonardi, P. M. 2012. Social Media Use in Organizations: Exploring the Affordances of Visibility, Editability, Persistence, and Association In: Communication Yearbook, Vol. 36, pp. 143-189, 2012, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2129853 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2129853
  41. Wang, Y. T., & Suthers, D. D. (2022, June). Understanding Affordances in Short-Form Videos: A Performative Perspective. In HCI International 2022 Posters: 24th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, HCII 2022, Virtual Event, June 26–July 1, 2022, Proceedings, Part III (pp. 312-319). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
  42. Zulli, D. & Zulli, D.J. 2020. Extending the Internet meme: Conceptualizing technological mimesis and imitation publics on the TikTok platform. New Media & Society, https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820983603