Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer


Vol. 4 No. 3 (2022): Gender, Sexuality, and Embodiment in Digital Spheres: Connecting Intersectionality and Digitality

Gender, Sexuality, and Embodiment in Digital Spheres: Connecting Intersectionality and Digitality

  • Sara De Vuyst
  • Evelien Geerts
  • Ladan Rahbari
June 14, 2022


Gender, sexuality and embodiment in digital spheres have been increasingly studied from various critical perspectives: From research highlighting the articulation of intimacies, desires, and sexualities in and through digital spaces to theoretical explorations of materiality in the digital realm. With such a high level of (inter)disciplinarity, theories, methods, and analyses of gender, sexuality, and embodiment in relation to digital spheres have become highly diversified. Aiming to reflect this diversity, this special issue brings together innovative and newly developed theoretical, empirical, analytical, and critical approaches in the study of gender, sexuality, and embodiment in digital spheres. By connecting intersectionality and digitality to one another, it adopts an integrated approach that reflects the intricacy and interconnectedness of social categories and markers of difference, privilege, performance, and discrimination. The contributions explore a range of differently situated digital cultural practices, including intimate and sexual experiences with(in) digital media, online self-presentation, expressions of digital resistance, and forms of backlash and online attacks. What connects all these articles, is their critical approach to intersectional inequalities and privileges in relation to digitality, plus their nuanced perspective on gender, sexuality, and embodiment interferentially. The final article is based on a roundtable discussion and aims to encourage interdisciplinary connections and suggests ways of doing research that builds bridges between academia and activism.


  1. Abidin, C. (2016) ‘“Aren’t These Just Young, Rich Women Doing Vain Things Online?”: Influencer Selfies as Subversive Frivolity,’ Social Media + Society, 2(2), pp. 1-17.
  2. Afful, A. A., & Ricciardelli, R. (2015) ‘Shaping the online fat acceptance movement: talking about body image and beauty standards,’ Journal of Gender Studies, 24(4), pp. 453-472.
  3. Amrute, S. (2019) ‘Of techno-ethics and techno-affects,’ Feminist Review, 123 (1), pp. 56-73.
  4. Araüna, N., Tortajada, I., & Willem, C. (2021) ‘Feminist YouTubers in Spain,’ In: Scarcelli M, Chronaki D, De Vuyst S, et al. (eds) Gender and Sexuality in the European Media. London: Routledge, pp. 11-23.
  5. Åsberg, C., & Lykke, N. (2010) ‘Feminist technoscience studies,’ European Journal of Women’s Studies, 17(4), pp. 299-305.
  6. Binns, A. (2012) ‘DON’T FEED THE TROLLS!,’ Journalism Practice, 6(4), pp. 547-562.
  7. Boler, M., & Davis, E. (eds.) (2020) Affective Politics of Digital Media: Propaganda by Other Means. New York – London: Routledge.
  8. Boyd, D. (2014) It’s Complicated: The Social Lives of Networked Teens. New Haven: Yale University Press.
  9. Bostrom, N. (2005) ‘A History of Transhumanist Thought,’ Journal of Evolution and Technology, 14(1), pp. 1-25.
  10. Braidotti, R. (2013) The Posthuman. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  11. Bruns, A. (2018) Gatewatching and News Curation: Journalism, Social Media, and the Public Sphere. New York: Lang.
  12. Butler, J. (1993) Bodies That Matter: On the Discursive Limits of ‘Sex.’ London: Routledge.
  13. Caldeira, S. P., De Ridder, S., & Van Bauwel, S. (2020) ‘Between the Mundane and the Political: Women’s Self-Representations on Instagram,’ Social Media + Society, 6(3), pp. 1-14.
  14. Chen, M. Y. (2012) Animacies: Biopolitics, Racial Mattering, and Queer Affect. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
  15. Chin, C., & Robison, M. (2020) How AI bots and voice assistants reinforce gender bias. Retrieved on 11 November 2021 from:
  16. Cooper, M. (2008) Life as Surplus: Biotechnology and Capitalism in the Neoliberal Era. Seattle: University of Washington Press.
  17. Criado Perez, C. (2021) Invisible women: data bias in a world designed for men. London: Random House.
  18. De Graeve, K. (2019) “No expectations”: straight men’s sexual and moral identity-making in non-monogamous dating. Sexualities, 22(5–6), pp. 844–859.
  19. De Vuyst, S. (2020) Hacking Gender in Technology and Journalism. New York: Routledge.
  20. D'Ignazio, C., & Klein, L. F. (2020) Data Feminism. Cambridge: MIT Press.
  21. Duguay, S. (2018) ‘The more I look like Justin Bieber in the pictures, the better”: Queer women’s self-representation on Instagram,’ In: Papacharissi Z (ed) A Networked Self: Platforms, Stories, Connections. New York: Routledge, pp.9 4-110.
  22. Elwood, S., & Leszczynski, A. (2018) ‘Feminist Digital Geographies,’ Gender, Place & Culture, 25 (5), pp. 629-644.
  23. Ferrando, F. (2013) ‘Posthumanism, Transhumanism, Antihumanism, Metahumanism, and New Materialisms: Differences and Relations,’ Existenz, 8(2), pp. 26-32.
  24. Geerts, E., & van der Tuin, I. (2013) ‘From Intersectionality to Interference: Feminist Onto-epistemological Reflections on the Politics of Representation,’ Women’s Studies International Forum, 41(3), pp. 171-78.
  25. Geerts, E. (2021) ‘Nieuw Materialisme: Een Cartografie [New Materialism: A Cartography]’, Wijsgerig Perspectief 61(2), pp. 34-41.
  26. Haraway, D. J. (1997) Modest_Witness@Second_Millenium: FemaleMan©_Meets_Oncomouse™. Feminism and Technoscience. New York: Routledge.
  27. Haraway, D. J. 1985. ‘A Manifesto for Cyborgs: Science, Technology, and Socialist Feminism in the 1980s.’ Socialist Review, 20, pp. 65-107.
  28. Heim, M. (1994) The Metaphysics of Virtual Reality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  29. Jane, E. A. (2014) ‘“Your a Ugly, Whorish, Slut: Understanding E-bile”,’ Feminist Media Studies, 14(4), pp. 531-546.
  30. Jackson, Z. I. (2020) Becoming Human: Matter and Meaning in an Antiblack World. New York: NYU Press.
  31. Jenkins, H. (2006) Convergence Culture: Where Old and New Media Collide. New York: New York University Press.
  32. Korkmazer, B., De Ridder, S., & Van Bauwel, S. (2021) The Visual Digital Self?: A discourse theoretical analysis of young people’s negotiations on gender, reputation and sexual morality online. DIGEST. Journal of Diversity and Gender Studies, 8(1), pp. 22–40.
  33. Lewis, R., Rowe, M., & Wiper, C. (2016) ‘Online Abuse of Feminists as An Emerging form of Violence Against Women and Girls,’ British Journal of Criminology, 57(6), pp. 1462-1481.
  34. Lovelock, M. (2017) ‘“My coming out story”: Lesbian, Gay and Bisexual Youth Identities on YouTube,’ International Journal of Cultural Studies, 22(1), pp. 70-85.
  35. Lupton, D. (2019) Data Selves: More-than-Human Perspectives. Cambridge: Polity.
  36. Matich, M., Ashman, R., & Parsons, E. (2019) ‘#Freethenipple – Digital Activism and Embodiment in the Contemporary Feminist Movement,’ Consumption Markets & Culture, 22(4), pp. 337-362.
  37. Mondé, G. C. (2018) ‘#BlackDontCrack: A Content Analysis of the Aging Black Woman in Social Media,’ Feminist Media Studies, 18(1): 47-60.
  38. More, M., & Vita-More, N. (eds.) (2013) The Transhumanist Reader: Classical and Contemporary Essays on the Science, Technology, and Philosophy of the Human Future. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
  39. Nikunen, K. (2021) ‘Ghosts of white methods? The challenges of Big Data research in exploring racism in digital context,’ Big Data & Society, 8 (2), pp. 1-17.
  40. Noble, S. U. (2018) Algorithms of Oppression: How Search Engines Reinforce Racism. New York: New York University Press.
  41. O’Riordan, K. (2020) ‘Queer Digital Cultures,’ In: Somerville SB (ed) The Cambridge Companion to Queer Studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 185-198.
  42. Perbawani P. S., Rahayu R., & Anshari, I. N. (2018) Online Political Participation and Netizen Anonymity in Indonesia’s Digital Democracy. PCD Journal 6: 185-212.
  43. Pew Research Center (2006) The strength of internet ties. Retrieved on 11 November 2021 from:
  44. Plant, S. (2020) ‘Feministische Theorie und Kritische Medienkulturanalyse: Ausgangspunkte und Perspektiven,’ In: Tanja, T., & Ulla W. (eds.) On the Matrix: Cyberfeminist simulations. Transcript Verlag, pp. 337-346.
  45. Puar, J. K. (2007) Terrorist Assemblages: Homonationalism in Queer Times. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
  46. Rahbari L. (2019a) In Her Shoes: Transnational Digital Solidarity with Muslim Women, or the Hijab? Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografie, 112, pp. 107-120.
  47. Rahbari, L. (2019b) ‘Pushing Gender to its Limits: Iranian Women Bodybuilders on Instagram,’ Journal of Gender Studies, 28(5), pp. 591-602.
  48. Rahbari L. (2021) Biopolitics of Non-Motherhood: Childfree Women on a Persian-Language Digital Platform for Mothers. ?stanbul University Journal of Sociology 41: 27-41.
  49. Reichert, R., & Richterich, A. (2015) ‘Introduction: Digital Materialism,’ Digital Culture & Society, 1(1), pp. 5-18.
  50. Ridder, S. D. & Dhaenens, F. (2019) ‘Coming Out as Popular Media Practice: The Politics of Queer Youth Coming Out on YouTube,’ DiGeSt. Journal of Diversity and Gender Studies, 6(2), pp. 43-60.
  51. Sadowski, H. (2016) ‘From #Aufschrei to Digital–Material Entanglements in the Context of German Digital Feminist Activisms,’ Feminist Media Studies, 16(1), pp. 55-69.
  52. Sandberg, L. (2013) ‘Affirmative Old Age: The Ageing Body and Feminist Theories on Difference. International Journal of Ageing and Later Life, 8(1), pp. 11-40.
  53. Scharff, C., Smith-Prei, C., & Stehle, M. (2016) ‘Digital Feminisms: Transnational Activism in German Protest Cultures,’ Feminist Media Studies, 16(1), pp. 1-16.
  54. Schmitz, R. M., Coley, J. S., Thomas C., & Ramirez, A. (2020) ‘The Cyber Power of Marginalized Identities: Intersectional Strategies of Online LGBTQ+ Latinx Activism,’ Feminist Media Studies, pp. 1-20.
  55. Springer, C. (1991) ‘The Pleasure of the Interface,’ Screen, 32(3), pp. 303-323.
  56. Terranova, T. (2004) Network Culture: Politics for the Information Age. London: Pluto.
  57. Tiidenberg, K. (2018) ‘Visibly Ageing Femininities: Women’s Visual Discourses of Being Over-40 and Over-50 on Instagram,’ Feminist Media Studies, 18(1), pp. 61-76.
  58. Turkle, S. (1996) Life on the Screen: Identity in the Age of the Internet. London: Weidenfeld.
  59. Van Doorn, N. (2011) ‘Digital Spaces, Material Traces: How Matter Comes to Matter in Online Performances of Gender, Sexuality and Embodiment,’ Media, Culture & Society, 33(4), pp. 531-547.
  60. Williams, S. (2016) ‘#SayHerName: Using Digital Activism to Document Violence against Black Women,’ Feminist Media Studies, 16(5), pp. 922-925.
  61. Wynter, S. (1994) ‘No Humans Involved: A Letter to My Colleagues,’ Forum N. H. I: Knowledge for the 21st Century, 1, pp. 42-73. Originally published in 1992.