Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Research Articles

Vol. 4 No. 3 (2022): Gender, Sexuality, and Embodiment in Digital Spheres: Connecting Intersectionality and Digitality

Pushing Intersectionality, Hybridity, and (Inter)Disciplinary Research on Digitality to Its Limits: A Conversation Among Scholars of Gender, Sexuality, and Embodiment

May 10, 2022


During the past two decades or so, the emergence and ever-accelerating development of digital media have sparked scholarly interest, debates, and complex challenges across many disciplines in the social sciences and the humanities. Within this diverse scholarship, the research on digitality, gender, sexuality, and embodiment has contributed substantially to many academic fields, such as media studies, sociology, religion, philosophy, and education studies. As a part of the special issue “Gender, Sexuality, and Embodiment in Digital Spheres: Connecting Intersectionality and Digitality,” this roundtable consists of a conversation between five researchers from different (inter)disciplinary locations, all addressing matters of methodology, intersectionality, positionality, and theory in relation to the topics of gender, sexuality, and embodiment in digital spheres. Said roundtable begins with a critical self-positioning of the participants’ (inter)disciplinary and embodied locations using examples from their own research. The conversation then progresses to how these researchers have employed contemporary theories, conceptual vocabularies, methods, and analyses of gender, sexuality, and embodiment in digital spheres to then conclude with some ethico-political notes about collaborations between scholars and (digital) activists.


  1. Abidin, C. (2016) ‘“Aren’t These Just Young, Rich Women Doing Vain Things Online?”: Influencer Selfies as Subversive Frivolity,’ Social Media + Society, 2(2), pp. 1-17.
  2. Ahmed, S. (2004) The Cultural Politics of Emotion. London: Routledge.
  3. Alingasa, A. P. T., & Ofreneo, M. A. P. (2021) ‘“Fearless, powerful, Filipino”: Identity positioning in the hashtag activism of #BabaeAko’, Feminist Media Studies, 21(4), pp. 587-603.
  4. Araüna, N., Tortajada, I., & Willem, C. (2021) ‘Feminist YouTubers in Spain’, in M. Scarcelli, D. Chronaki, S. De Vuyst, & S. Villanueva Baselga (Eds.), Gender and Sexuality in the European Media, pp. 11-23. London: Routledge.
  5. Barad, K. (2007) Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
  6. Barad, K. (2001) ‘Scientific Literacy ---> Agential Literacy = (Learning + Doing) Science Responsibly,’ In Mayberry, M., Subramaniam, B. & L. H. Weasel (Eds.), Feminist Science Studies: A New Generation, pp. 226-246. New York: Routledge.
  7. Binns, A. (2012) ‘DON’T FEED THE TROLLS!’, Journalism Practice, 6(4), pp. 547-562.
  8. Bhabha, H. K. (2004) The Location of Culture. 2nd edition. London: Routledge.
  9. Blackmore, S. (2002) ‘The Power of Memes’, Scientific American, 283(4), pp. 52-61.
  10. Brandt, N. van den (2019). ‘Secularity, gender, and emancipation: Thinking through feminist activism and feminist approaches to the secular’, Religion, 49(4), pp. 691-716.
  11. Braidotti, R. (2011) Nomadic Subjects: Embodiment and Sexual Difference in Contemporary Feminist Theory. 2nd edition. New York: Columbia University Press. Originally published in 1994.
  12. Braidotti, R. (2013) The Posthuman. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  13. Butler, J. (1990) Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. New York: Routledge.
  14. Butler, J. (1993) Bodies That Matter: On the Discursive Limits of ‘Sex.’ London: Routledge.
  15. Bennett, J. (2010) Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things. London: Duke University Press.
  16. Calhoun, C., Juergensmeyer, M., & VanAntwerpen, J. (Eds.) (2011) Rethinking Secularism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  17. Chen, M. Y. (2012) Animacies: Biopolitics, Racial Mattering, and Queer Affect. Durham: Duke University Press.
  18. C. M. K., (2021) Menopause: A Comic Treatment. Pennsylvania: Penn State University Press.
  19. Chadwick, A. (2013) The Hybrid Media System: Politics and Power. 1st edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  20. Chakravartty, P., & Ferreira Da Silva, D. (2012) ‘Accumulation, dispossession, and debt: The racial logic of global capitalism—An introduction’, American Quarterly, 64(3), pp. 361-385.
  21. Cooper, B. (2016) ‘Intersectionality’, in Disch, L. J., & Hawkesworth, M. E. (Eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Feminist Theory, pp. 385-406. New York: Oxford University Press.
  22. Cooper, M. (2008) Life as Surplus: Biotechnology and Capitalism in the Neoliberal Era. Seattle: University of Washington Press.
  23. Crenshaw, K. (1989). ‘Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics’, University of Chicago Legal Forum, pp. 139-167.
  24. Dawkins, R. (1976) The Selfish Gene. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  25. Dearden, L. 2016, August 13. ‘Isis “jihadi brides” trying to radicalise girls and encourage UK terror attacks online as they remain trapped in Syria.’ The Independent. kadiza-sultana-radicalise-terror-trapped-abuse-married-air-a7187946.html.
  26. Del Pilar, B. M., & Peeren, E. (2013) ‘The spectral turn’, in del Pilar, B., & Peeren, E. (eds.) The Spectralities Reader: Ghosts and Haunting in Contemporary Cultural Theory, pp. 31-36. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
  27. Deleuze, G. (1995). Negotiations. New York: Columbia University Press.
  28. Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (2005) A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. Translation and Foreword by B. Massumi. University of Minnesota Press. Originally published in French in 1980.
  29. De Vuyst, S. (2020). Hacking Gender in Technology and Journalism: New York: Routledge.
  30. De Vuyst, S. (2021) ‘Creating a patchwork of unruliness: The grumpy old woman as affect alien’, International Journal of Cultural Studies, pp. 1-17.
  31. Evolvi, G. (2019) ‘The veil and its materiality: Muslim women’s digital narratives about the burkini ban’, Journal of Contemporary Religion, 34(3), pp. 469-487.
  32. Evolvi, G. (2020). ‘Materiality, Authority, and Digital Religion: The Case of a Neo-Pagan Forum’, Entangled Religions, 11(3).
  33. Evolvi, G. (Forthcoming) ‘The World Congress of Families: Anti-Gender Christianity and Digital Far-Right Populism’, Journal of International Communication.
  34. Fairclough, N. (2013) ‘Critical discourse analysis and critical policy studies’, Critical Policy Studies, 7(2), pp. 177-197.
  35. Gane, N., & Haraway, D. J. (2006) ‘When We Have Never Been Human, What Is to Be Done? Interview with Donna Haraway’, Theory, Culture & Society, 23(7-8), pp. 135-158.
  36. Geerts, E. Forthcoming. ‘A Critical Cartography of the Materialisations of Identity & Identity Politics: From Intersectional to Interferential Explorations’, in Kontturi, K-K, Leppänen, T., Mehrabi, T., and Tiainen, M. (Eds.) Making Middles Matter: Feminist Methodologies in-between New Materialisms and Intersectionality. London: Routledge.
  37. Geerts, E. (2019) ‘Niew Materialisme: Een Cartografie [New Materialism: A Cartografie]’, Wijsgerig Perspectief 61(2), pp. 34-41.
  38. Geerts, E. (2021, June 16) ‘Jürgen Conings: the case of a Belgian soldier on the run shows how the pandemic collides with far-right extremism’, The Conversation.
  39. Geerts, E., & van der Tuin, I. (2021) ‘Diffraction & Reading Diffractively’, MATTER: Journal of New Materialist Research, 2(1), pp. 173-177.
  40. Geerts, E., & van der Tuin, I. (2013) ‘From Intersectionality to Interference: Feminist Onto-epistemological Reflections on the Politics of Representation’, Women’s Studies International Forum, 41(3), pp. 171-78.
  41. Geerts, E. (2019) ‘Zonder de Ander, ook geen Zelf [Without the Other, no Self]’, Wijsgerig Perspectief 59(1), pp. 14-24.
  42. Gieseking, J. J. (2020) A Queer New York: Geographies of Lesbians, Dykes, and Queers. New York: NYU Press.
  43. Giorgi, A. (2021) ‘Religious feminists and the intersectional feminist movements: Insights from a case study’, European Journal of Women’s Studies, 28(2), pp. 244-259.
  44. Gorski, P. S., Kim, D. K., Torpey, J., & Vanantwerpen, J. (2012). The Post-Secular in Question: Religion in Contemporary Society. New York: New York University Press.
  45. Graff, A. (2016) ‘“Gender Ideology”: Weak Concepts, Powerful Politics,’ Religion and Gender, 6(2), pp. 268-272.
  46. Gray, K. L., & Adeyemo, B. (2021) ‘Not “falling for the okey-doke”: #BlackLivesMatter as resistance to disinformation in online communities’, Feminist Media Studies, 21(5), pp. 868-871.
  47. Gregg, M., & Seighworth, G. J. (Eds.) (2010) The Affect Theory Reader. Durham: Duke University Press.
  48. Grusin, R. (2010) Premediation: Affect and Mediality after 9/11. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
  49. House, R. (2021) Resistance, Sustenance, Protection. Self-published.
  50. Haraway, D. J. (1985) ‘A Manifesto for Cyborgs: Science, Technology, and Socialist Feminism in the 1980s.’ Socialist Review, 20, pp. 65-107.
  51. Haraway, D. J. (1991) Simians, Cyborgs, and Women: The Reinvention of Nature. New York: Routledge.
  52. Haraway, D. J. (1997) Modest_Witness@Second_Millenium: FemaleMan©_Meets_Oncomouse™. Feminism and Technoscience. New York: Routledge.
  53. Haraway, D. J. (2016) Staying with the Trouble: Making Kin in the Chthulucene. Durham: Duke University Press.
  54. Horton, J., & Kraftl, P. (2009) ‘Small acts, kind words, and “not too much fuss”: Implicit activisms’, Emotion, Space and Society, 2(1), pp. 14-23.
  55. Hayles, N. K. (1999) How We Became Posthuman: Virtual Bodies in Cybernetics, Literature, and Informatics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  56. Hutchings, T., & McKenzie, J. (Eds.) (2016) Materiality and the Study of Religion: The Stuff of the Sacred. London – New York: Routledge.
  57. Jackson, A. Y., & Mazzei, L.A. (2012) Thinking with Theory in Qualitative Research: Viewing Data across Multiple Perspectives. London: Routledge.
  58. Jackson, Z. I. (2020) Becoming Human: Matter and Meaning in an Antiblack World. New York: NYU Press.
  59. Jackson, Z. I. (2013) ‘Animal: New Directions in the Theorization of Race and Posthumanism,’ Feminist Studies, 39 (3), pp. 669-85.
  60. James, R. (2016) ‘Strategic activism, educational leadership, and social justice,’ International Journal of Leadership in Education, 19 (1), pp. 87-100.
  61. Jane, E. A. (2014) ‘“You’re an Ugly, Whorish, Slut”’, Feminist Media Studies, 14(4), pp. 531-546.
  62. Kargar, S. and McManamen, K. 2018. ‘Censorship and Collateral Damage: Analyzing the Telegram Ban in Iran’ (September 2018). Berkman Klein Center Research Publication, 2018-4, Available at SSRN:
  63. Lovheim, M. (2013) Media, Religion and Gender: Key Issues and New Challenges. New York – London: Routledge.
  64. Lupton, D. (2017) ‘Feeling your data: Touch and making sense of personal digital data’, New Media & Society, 19(10), pp. 1599-1614.
  65. LSE Digital Ethnography Collective (2021). Collective Reading List. Retrieved from
  66. Kuhar, R., & Paternotte, D. (Eds.) (2017) Anti-Gender Campaigns in Europe: Mobilizing against Equality. London – New York: Rowman & Littlefield International.
  67. Lykke, N. (2013) ‘This Discipline Which Is Not One. Feminist Studies as a Postdiscipline,’ in Buikema, R., Griffin, G. & Lykke, N. Theories and Methodologies in Postgraduate Feminist Research: Researching Differently, pp. 137-150. New York: Routledge. Originally published in 2011.
  68. Mahmood, S. (2005) Politics of Piety: The Islamic Revival and the Feminist Subject. Princeton University Press.
  69. Mahmudova, L., & Evolvi, G. (2021) ‘Likes, Comments, and Follow Requests: The Instagram User Experiences of Young Muslim Women in the Netherlands’, Journal of Religion, Media, and Digital Culture, 10(1), pp. 50-70.
  70. McCall, L. (2005) ‘The Complexity of Intersectionality’, Signs, 30(3), pp. 1771-1800.
  71. Meyer, B. (2010) Aesthetic Formations: Media, Religion, and the Senses. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
  72. Massumi, B. (2015) Ontopower: War, Powers, and the State of Perception. Durham: Duke University Press.
  73. McKittrick, K. (2021) Dear Science and Other Stories. Durham and London: Duke University Press.
  74. Mirza, H. S., & Meetoo, V. (2018) ‘Empowering Muslim girls? Post- feminism, multiculturalism and the production of the “model” Muslim female student in British schools,’ British Journal of Sociology of Education, 39(2), pp. 227-241.
  75. Mirza, H. S. (2013) ‘“A second skin”: Embodied intersectionality, transnationalism and narratives of identity and belonging among Muslim women in Britain.’ Women’s Studies International Forum, 36, pp. 5-15.
  76. More, M., & Vita-More, N. (Eds.) (2013) The Transhumanist Reader: Classical and Contemporary Essays on the Science, Technology, and Philosophy of the Human Future. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
  77. Niccolini, A. D., Zarabadi, S., & Ringrose, J. (2018) ‘Spinning Yarns: Affective Kinshipping as Posthuman Pedagogy.’ Parallax, 24(3), pp. 324-343.
  78. Omas Gegen Rechts (2021) Omas Gegen Rechts – das Erste. Retrieved on September 21, 2021.
  79. Peto, A. (2016) ‘How are Anti-Gender Movements Changing Gender Studies as a Profession?’, Religion and Gender, 6(2), pp. 297-299.
  80. Puar, J. K. (2012) ‘“I Would Rather Be a Cyborg Than a Goddess”: Becoming-Intersectional in Assemblage Theory’, PhiloSOPHIA, 2(1), pp. 49-66.
  81. Puar, J. K. (2007) Terrorist Assemblages: Homonationalism in Queer Times. Durham: Duke University Press.
  82. Pennington, R. (2018) ‘Social media as third spaces? Exploring Muslim identity and connection in Tumblr’, International Communication Gazette, 80(7), pp. 620-636.
  83. Puar, J. K. (2012) ‘“I would rather be a cyborg than a goddess”: Becoming- Intersectional in Assemblage Theory.’ philoSOPHIA: A Journal of Transcontinental Feminism 2 (1): 49–66.
  84. Puig de la Bellacasa, M. (2017) Matters of Care: Speculative Ethics in More Than Human Worlds. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  85. Rahbari, L. (2021) ‘Biopolitics of Non-Motherhood: Childfree Women on a Persian-Language Digital Platform for Mothers’, ?stanbul University Journal of Sociology, 41(1), pp. 27-41.
  86. Rahbari, L. (2020a) ‘Duffs and puffs: Queer fashion in Iranian cyberspace’, Middle East Critique, 29(1), pp. 69-86.
  87. Rahbari, L. (2020b) ‘Serial Acid Attacks and Women’s Online and Offline Resistance and Activism in Iran’, Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society.
  88. Rahbari, L. (2019a) ‘Pushing gender to its limits: Iranian women bodybuilders on Instagram’, Journal of Gender Studies, 28(5), pp. 591-602.
  89. Rahbari, L., Dierickx, S., Coene, G., & Longman, C. (2019b) ‘Transnational Solidarity with Which Muslim Women? The Case of the My Stealthy Freedom and World Hijab Day Campaigns’, Politics & Gender, 17(1), pp. 112-135.
  90. Renold, E. & Ringrose, J. (2016) ‘Selfies, relfies and phallic tagging: posthuman part-icipations in teen digital sexuality assemblages’, Educational Philosophy and Theory, 49 (11), pp. 1066-1079.
  91. Renold, E. (2017) ‘“Feel what I feel”: Making da(r)ta with teen girls for creative activisms on how sexual violence matters’, Journal of Gender Studies, 27(1), pp 37-55.
  92. Soria, E., Pérez, L.O. (2018) Hacks De Vida: consejos préticos para la atención a personas que enfrentan violencias de género en línea en América Latina. Institute for War and Peace Reporting. Retrieved from
  93. Treré, E. (2019) Hybrid media activism: Ecologies, imaginaries, algorithms. New York – London: Routledge.
  94. Shain, F. (2003) The Schooling and Identity of Asian Girls. Stoke-on-Trent: Trentham Books.
  95. Schmider, A. (2016, June 2) ‘EA introduces new gender options in “The Sims”’, GLAAD.
  96. Springgay, S., &Truman, S.E. (2018) Walking Methodologies in a More-than-Human World: WalkingLab. New York: Routledge.
  97. Taylor, C.A., Hughes, C. , & Ulmer, J. B. (2020) Transdisciplinary Feminist Research, Innovations in Theory, Method and Practice. London and New York: Routledge.
  98. Taylor, C.A. (2018) ‘Edu-crafting posthumanist adventures in/for higher education: A speculative musing,’ Parallax, 24(3), pp. 371-381.
  99. Thrift, N. (2008) Non-representational Theory: Space, Politics, Affect. London: Routledge.
  100. Tuhiwai Smith, L. (2012) Decolonising Methodologies, Research and Indigenous Peoples. London and New York: Zed Books.
  101. Williams, S. (2016) ‘#SayHerName: Using digital activism to document violence against black women’, Feminist Media Studies, 16(5), pp. 922-925.
  102. Zarabadi, S. (2021) Racialising assemblages and affective events: A feminist new materialism and posthuman study of Muslim schoolgirls in London. Doctoral thesis (Ph.D.), London: University College London.
  103. Zarabadi, S., & Ringrose, J. (2018) ‘Re-mattering Media Affects: Pedagogical Interference into Pre-emptive Counter-Terrorism Culture’, in S. Riddle, & A. Baroutsis. Education Research and the Media: Challenges and Possibilities, pp. 66-79. London: Routledge.
  104. Zhongxuan, L., & Yang, L. (2019) ‘Individual and collective empowerment: Women’s voices in the #MeToo movement in China’, Asian Journal of Women’s Studies, 25(1), pp. 117-131.
  105. Zasanska, N. D. (2019) ‘New Producers of Patriarchal Ideology: Matushki in Digital Media of Russian Orthodox Church’, Journal for Communication Studies, 12(2), pp. 99-128.
  106. Zobl, E., & Drüeke, R. (2012) Feminist Media: Participatory Spaces, Networks and Cultural Citizenship. Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag.